al-Zawahiri Letter Published by DNI

October 12, 2005, 12:45 pm
  


 



The full text of a letter written by al-Qaeda’s second-in-command, Ayman al-Zawahiri, has been published by the U.S.’s Director of National Intelligence (in English; in Arabic). The letter, from al-Zawahiri and addressed to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, in charge of al-Qaeda’s terrorism operations in Iraq, basically confirms the Bush administration’s strategy in the war against Islamo-fascism.

Beyond al-Zawahiri’s abject racist statements, he confirms al-Qaeda’s vision of Islamic conquest on a grand scale:

I want to be the first to congratulate you for what God has blessed you with in terms of fighting battle in the heart of the Islamic world, which was formerly the field for major battles in Islam’s history, and what is now the place for the greatest battle of Islam in this era, and what will happen, according to what appeared in the Hadiths of the Messenger of God about the epic battles between Islam and atheism. It has always been my belief that the victory of Islam will never take place until a Muslim state is established in the manner of the Prophet in the heart of the Islamic world, specifically in the Levant, Egypt, and the neighboring states of the Peninsula and Iraq; however, the center would be in the Levant and Egypt. …

As for the battles that are going on in the far-flung regions of the Islamic world, such as Chechnya, Afghanistan, Kashmir, and Bosnia, they are just the groundwork and the vanguard for the major battles which have begun in the heart of the Islamic world. We ask God that He send down his victory upon us that he promised to his faithful worshipers.

Computers4SURE (4SURE.com - An Office Depot Co.)

As to al-Zawahiri’s racism against Muslims and others who do not believe what he believes:

What I mean is that God has blessed you and your brothers while many of the Muslim mujahedeen have longed for that blessing, and that is Jihad in the heart of the Islamic world. He has, in addition to that, granted you superiority over the idolatrous infidels, traitorous apostates, and those turncoat deviants. …

God also blessed you not only with the splendor of the spearhead of Jihad, but with the splendor as well of the doctrines of monotheism, the rejection of polytheism, and avoidance of the tenets of the secularists and detractors and inferiors, the call to the pure way of the Prophet, and the sublime goal that the Prophet @ left to his companions.

Hey all you left-wing, secularist appeasers out there: al-Zawahiri is talking about you.

And how does al-Zawahiri feel about his “fellow” Shiite Muslims?

People of discernment and knowledge among Muslims know the extent of danger to Islam of the Twelve’er school of Shiism. It is a religious school based on excess and falsehood whose function is to accuse the companions of Muhammad of heresy in a campaign against Islam, in order to free the way for a group of those who call for a dialogue in the name of the hidden mahdi who is in control of existence and infallible in what he does. Their prior history in cooperating with the enemies of Islam is consistent with their current reality of connivance with the Crusaders.

But al-Zawahiri is Machievellian is his strategy towards the Shiites (wait until later to kill them all):

… these are the fruits to be expected from the rejectionist Shia sect and their opinion of the Sunnis. …

We must repeat what we mentioned previously, that the majority of Muslims don’t comprehend this and possibly could not even imagine it. For that reason, many of your Muslim admirers amongst the common folk are wondering about your attacks on the Shia. The sharpness of this questioning increases when the attacks are on one of their mosques, and it increases more when the attacks are on the mausoleum of Imam Ali Bin Abi Talib, may God honor him. My opinion is that this matter won’t be acceptable to the Muslim populace however much you have tried to explain it, and aversion to this will continue.

Indeed, questions will circulate among mujahedeen circles and their opinion makers about the correctness of this conflict with the Shia at this time. Is it something that is unavoidable? Or, is it something can be put off until the force of the mujahed movement in Iraq gets stronger? And if some of the operations were necessary for self-defense, were all of the operations necessary? Or, were there some operations that weren’t called for? And is the opening of another front now in addition to the front against the Americans and the government a wise decision? Or, does this conflict with the Shia lift the burden from the Americans by diverting the mujahedeen to the Shia, while the Americans continue to control matters from afar? And if the attacks on Shia leaders were necessary to put a stop to their plans, then why were there attacks on ordinary Shia? Won’t this lead to reinforcing false ideas in their minds, even as it is incumbent on us to preach the call of Islam to them and explain and communicate to guide them to the truth? And can the mujahedeen kill all of the Shia in Iraq? Has any Islamic state in history ever tried that? And why kill ordinary Shia considering that they are forgiven because of their ignorance? And what loss will befall us if we did not attack the Shia? And do the brothers forget that we have more than one hundred prisoners - many of whom are from the leadership who are wanted in their countries - in the custody of the Iranians? And even if we attack the Shia out of necessity, then why do you announce this matter and make it public, which compels the Iranians to take counter measures? And do the brothers forget that both we and the Iranians need to refrain from harming each other at this time in which the Americans are targeting us?

Hitler wrote “Mein Kampf” long before he started his reign of terror, and yet the Islamo-fascists have already carried out myriad atrocities against their own people and others — plus they have published their fatwas, and shown their barbarous beheadings on the Internet. Their writing has been on the wall for years, yet the multiculturalists still cling to the notion that the Islamo-fascists are driven by persecution and desperation. Never mind the persecution wrought by the Islamists themselves.

Alibris




Related: War Against Islamo-fascism


4 Responses to “al-Zawahiri Letter Published by DNI”

  1. tigersun.net » US intercepts an Al Qaeda letter about the strategy; what happens next? Says:

    [...] *Update*: full translated text of the letter is available at netwmd.com [...]

  2. netwmd.com - The War to Mobilize Democracy » Blog Archive » Kerry on Iraq: Say What? Says:

    [...] Iraq’s terrorists have been busy killing far more civilians than American soldiers. Certainly there is hatred for Americans by Iraq’s terrorists, but it is the democratic process they fear the most. As al-Qaeda puts it, their fight is one of the “epic battles between Islam and atheism.” [...]

  3. netwmd.com - The War to Mobilize Democracy » Blog Archive » Questioning the Iraq War Says:

    [...] We’re causing the insurgency? A speedy American withdrawal is just what the jihadists want – to fulfill their dream of creating an Islamist caliphate in the heart of the Middle East, then spreading it. This is what al-Qaeda says in its own words – and it makes all sorts of racist statements against Iraq’s Shiites. [...]

  4. netwmd.com - The War to Mobilize Democracy » Blog Archive » Sorry We Blew Up Your Wedding, Part II Says:

    [...] Now, how al-Qaeda really feels about its fellow Shiite Muslims: People of discernment and knowledge among Muslims know the extent of danger to Islam of the Twelve’er school of Shiism. It is a religious school based on excess and falsehood whose function is to accuse the companions of Muhammad of heresy in a campaign against Islam, in order to free the way for a group of those who call for a dialogue in the name of the hidden mahdi who is in control of existence and infallible in what he does. Their prior history in cooperating with the enemies of Islam is consistent with their current reality of connivance with the Crusaders. [...]

Leave a Reply

By posting a comment, you agree to our Terms of Service and Usage.