Washington Post Elevates Muslim Savagery to “Movement” Status

February 16, 2006, 3:24 pm


By Andrew L. Jaffee

Rome paid tribute to the barbarians clamoring at her gates. It didn’t do any good. Paying ransom only postponed the inevitable sacking, burning, and looting of the empire’s capital. The UK’s Neville Chamberlain sought to pacify Hitler, only to see Brits hiding in basements from the blitzkrieg a few years later. Instead of remembering history’s lessons, the Washington Post today indulges in feel-good, intellectual rationalization of Muslim intolerance and hatred.

Stock Photos from 123RF

In a 5-page manifesto entitled, “Anatomy of the Cartoon Protest Movement,” authors Anthony Shadid and Kevin Sullivan exercise unlimited poetic license, calling Islamist hooliganism “a rare moment of empowerment among Muslims who have felt besieged.” What sheer sophistry to label the Muslim rampaging, killing, and burning of embassies as “empowerment.” What precisely is Islam besieged by, except its own violent, intolerant, inner child? Is the murdering of Muslims by other Muslims, or the torching of Muslim-owned mobile phone shops, now to be reconstructed in the terms of the American civil rights movement?

Not even the BBC, well-known for political correctness, has gone that far:

But given the nature of the violence, few seem convinced the riots are either spontaneous or driven purely by public indignation at the satirical cartoons.

For one, most of the public and private property attacked by the rioters cannot even remotely be linked to the cartoons.

The buildings burned in Lahore and Peshawar included cinemas, a theatre, banks, mobile phone outlets, fast food restaurants, the Punjab assembly building, petrol stations, music and video shops.

Most of the vehicles set alight were motorbikes, which are owned mostly by lower middle class people.

Such targets have nothing to do with the cartoons but have historically been the target of choice for religious activists whenever they have had a reason to take to the streets.

The Post’s authors are missing the point. Here is their myopic sanitization of the cartoon controversy: “On one side is a defense of freedom of expression, on the other an unforgivable insult to a sacred figure.” Have either of these writers ever read the Constitution, Bill of Rights, or Federalist Papers? Do they understand the spirit, let alone the letter, of the term, “freedom of expression?”

.Mac (Apple Computer, Inc.)

The editor/writer who does get the point is Flemming Rose, of the Danish Jyllands-Posten which published the “unforgivable insult,” but who rightly did not see it as such:

This was a legitimate news story to cover, and Jyllands-Posten decided to do it by adopting the well-known journalistic principle: Show, don’t tell.

“Unforgivable” by whom? A bunch of uncivilized, insecure, Muslim rioters, or by the free electorate of the Western world?

Again, Flemming Rose:

Has Jyllands-Posten insulted and disrespected Islam? It certainly didn’t intend to. But what does respect mean? When I visit a mosque, I show my respect by taking off my shoes. I follow the customs, just as I do in a church, synagogue or other holy place. But if a believer demands that I, as a nonbeliever, observe his taboos in the public domain, he is not asking for my respect, but for my submission. And that is incompatible with a secular democracy.

The West has to endure almost daily attacks from the Muslim world (see below, from the ADL, CNN.com, and http://www.iris.org.il/blog/):

Muslim thuggery

Muslim thuggery

Muslim thuggery

Original links:
Images cached for posterity.

Islamists desire for world domination...

The civilized world endures this constant barbarity with amazing alacrity and aloofness, just as one would expect from free peoples. Such hand-wringing is never afforded to Western self-loathing, for example, the Piss Christ, or “art exhibits” which are always defended as expressions of “free speech:”

Alibris connects people who love books, music, and movies to thousands of independent sellers around the world. Search over 60 million used & new books, music, & movies to find great deals!

…the work …has a boat floating in a pool of red liquid…

But its Israeli-born creator rejected the [call for genocide] charge, saying the work had a message of openness and conciliation. …

Called Snow White And The Madness Of Truth, the installation features a photo of Hanadi Jaradat, a 29-year-old trainee lawyer who blew up herself and 19 Israelis in a Haifa restaurant in October.

The work is accompanied by a piece of Bach music entitled My Heart Is Swimming In Blood.

Who’s even heard of the Sweden-based “Snow White And The Madness Of Truth?” Anti-European-American, racist comments have been enshrined in a monument erected with taxpayer money in Baldwin Park, California. Kamau Kambon, visiting professor at North Carolina State University, called for the elimination of all white people on the planet. U of Colorado prof Ward Churchill labeled 9/11 victims as “Nazis.” Harry Belafonte referred to Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell as “Uncle Toms.” And Howard Dean quipped that African Americans are only good for the dirty jobs as “hotel staff.” What? No riots?

In fact, Jews who’ve grown up in Israel have shown how true, enlightened democrats deal with “insults” to their religion:

Amitai Sandy (29), graphic artist and publisher of Dimona Comix Publishing, from Tel-Aviv, Israel, has followed the unfolding of the “Muhammad cartoon-gate” events in amazement, until finally he came up with the right answer to all this insanity – and so he announced today the launch of a new anti-Semitic cartoons contest – this time drawn by Jews themselves!

“We’ll show the world we can do the best, sharpest, most offensive Jew hating cartoons ever published!” said Sandy. “No Iranian will beat us on our home turf!”

NOW THAT’S ENLIGHTENED AND EVOLVED: Humor from a country in which the Islamists wish to commit genocide. But you’ll not hear of this. Mostly what you’ll hear about are the poor, mistreated, Muslims.

And I can assure you that most Westerners are now well aware of the Mohammed caricatures. Poor, besieged Muslims. In truth, it is the civilized world which is now besieged — besieged by an angry hoard of intolerant Muslims.

Islamists massacred 344 civilians — half of them children — in Beslan, North Ossetia. They killed 62 in Delhi, India; murdered 50+ in Turkey; and have killed tens of thousands in Indonesia, Algeria, and Nigeria. Al-Qaeda slaughtered 88 innocent Egyptians last July 23.

1,095 innocent Israelis have been killed by Palestinian terrorists since September 2000. Thirty-thousand Iraqis, mostly Muslim, have been slaughtered by Islamist terrorists since the country’s liberation.

Computers4SURE (4SURE.com - An Office Depot Co.)

9/11 (3000 dead). Madrid (200 dead). London (50 dead). Bali (200 dead). Amman (57 dead). Three-hundred trampled to death in this year’s Hajj; 1,426 killed in the 1990 Hajj; 251 in 2004; etc. Sudanese Muslims have slaughtered 180,000 black Africans. Kuwaitis ethnically cleansed 400,000 Palestinians in 1991.

In countries like Iran, there is no figuring things out through consensus. There is the (Orwellian) Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. He has ultimate control over all decisions. His thugs banned Western music in December (no more “George Michael’s ‘Careless Whisper,’ Eric Clapton’s ‘Rush’ and the Eagles’ ‘Hotel California…’” and “…tunes by saxophonist Kenny G.”). Iran’s theocracy hung two boys for being gay last July. Last month, the mullahs banned access to the BBC’s website. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad urged that Israel be “wiped off the map,” has denied that the Holocaust ever occurred, called for Israel’s Jews to be moved to Europe (ethnically cleansed), and has planned to host a conference to “prove” that Hitler’s extermination of Jews (and gypsies and gays) was a “myth.”

Are these not all issues which should inflame Shadid and Sullivan? Instead, the politically-correct rant about the “cultural sensitivities” of Muslims — not those silly white-skinned peoples, and not those other silly moderate Muslims, whom do exist. No sympathy for Dutch filmmaker Theo Van Gogh, who’s throat was slit by Islamists because he dared make a film about the mistreatment of women in Muslim societies? What about Hollywood producer Moustafa Akkad, blown to bits in Amman, Jordan by al-Qaeda last November? And now, Danish cartoonists — artists — are hiding for fear of having their throats slit by angry Muslims.

Shadid and Sullivan are not the evolved, introspective thinkers they would have you believe they are. These guys’ motivations are much lower and baser. They are just plain afraid of having their throats’ slit; losing their high-paying, cushy jobs at the Post; or having to suffer through the bombing of a Washington subway train by the Islamist “movement” that they attempt to placate… rather unsuccessfully.

Special Report: Danish Cartoons

Stock Photos from 123RF

Related: Arab/Muslim World, Islam, Political Correctness, War Against Islamo-fascism

3 Responses to “Washington Post Elevates Muslim Savagery to “Movement” Status”

  1. Louise Pharand Says:

    From web.amnesty.org, on the newspaper that stoked the outrage over Danish cartoons:

    The Rakyat Merdeka cases

    Rakyat Merdeka is a daily tabloid owned by the country’s largest media group, Jawa Pos, that has gained prominence as a result of its gritty, often abrasive, style, with articles and caricatures that frequently strongly criticize the political establishment.

    Two of the paper’s editors are facing legal sanctions for publishing material deemed insulting. In one case, the former editor has been tried and found guilty of defamation under Article 310 of the Criminal Code (KUHP), while the other is currently on trial and charged under Article 134 of KUHP for insulting the President, an offence punishable by up to six years in jail.


  2. s.h.rebinowitz Says:

    In the aftermath of the Danish cartoon fiasco, two things are abundantly clear. First, that Islam continues to be
    a very dangerous and violent religion. Secondly, the hypocrisy of a majority of Muslims apparently knows no bounds.
    Even those that openly agree with freedoms of speech and press are quick to condemn anyone that actually has
    the audacity to excercise either. “Responsibility’ and “restraint” are cautioned where the chance of offending a Muslim
    may arise. We are also lectured, on both sides, to be more “tolerant” toward those of the Islamic faith.
    Recently, a letter in the Boston Globe by Tariq Ramadan (” At the crossroad of Islam, the West”, Feb.9,2006)
    enlightened us with the following: “…Western societies, unlike muslim-majority countries, have grown accustomed to
    derision, irony, and criticism of religious symbols, the Pope, Jesus Christ, and even God. Even though Muslims do
    not share this attitude…”. Mr. Ramadan is either delusional or simply blinded by a religion that has turned so many into
    madmen, as evidenced in the last four months of violence, over a cartoon drawing.
    Let us start with the fact that not only are Muslims throughout the Middle East and their Governments openly critical
    of other religions, they routinely persecute those that worship outside the Islamic faith. Christians are detained, tortured,

    raped, executed. Their homes are ransacked and often destroyed. In 2000, Arabs demolished Joseph’s tomb, torching
    the ancient shrine and murdering a rabbi who tried to save a Torah from the flames. In 2001, the Taliban destroyed
    two priceless 1500 year old statues of Buddha in a wonderful example of tolerance. It is also a fact that radical Islamics
    are among the most intolerant people on the planet, yet the rest of the non-Muslim world should walk on eggshells
    lest we offend their thin-skinned sensibilities. Say something derogatory about Mohammed? They’ll cut your head off.
    Handle the Koran the wrong way? They’ll cut off your hands. This is a classic example of, ” Do as I say, not as I do”.

    Non-Islamic worshipers have endured far worse than unflattering cartoons over the years. For example, in 1989,

    under the guise of “art”, photographer Andres Serrano shocked and outraged many Christians with a photograph

    of a crucifix submerged in urine called, “Piss Christ”. Other offensive books and movies, “The last temptation of Christ”,
    “The passion of the Christ”, and “The DaVinci Code”, have upset and insulted Christians and Jews worldwide.

    Were buildings burned? People killed in violent protests? Demands for the executions of the people responsible for

    these blasphemies? None.Civilized people do not do such things. Unfortunately for Theo Van Gogh, he didn’t

    concern himself with the ramifications of insulting the Muslim world. After releasing his 10 minute movie-short,
    “Submission”, which criticized the treatment of Muslim women under Islam, he was brutally murdered in broad daylight.
    Shot repeatedly and begging for his life, Mohammed Bouyeri proceeded to hack at Van Gogh’s throat with a large knife,
    nearly decapitating him. He then attached a 5 page letter of protest, with a list of prominent Dutch citizens to be murdered,
    to Van Gogh’s chest with the same knife. Bouyeri, in a courtroom confession, vowed to repeat this act, if given the chance.
    Clutching a Koran, he stated, ” The law compels me to chop off the head of anyone who insults Allah or the prophet.”

    Over sixteen years since he was condemned to death by Ayatollah Khomeini, with a million dollar bounty on his head,
    Salman Rushdie’s “Satanic Verses” still guarantees someone a healthy stipend for his death. (It was doubled in 1997,
    and increased to 2.8 million in 1999 by Ayatollah Sanei.) Even the former peace-loving 70′s pop idol, Cat Stevens (a.k.a.
    Yusuf Islam), writer of such ballads as “Peace Train”, and “Morning has broken”, supported the Fatwa against Rushdie,
    “…the Qur’an makes it clear, if someone defames the prophet, then he must die…”. What kind of religion could convert a
    person from peace,love and freedom for all, to condoning murder over written words?
    Tolerance and respect are reciprocal in life. You get what you give, as it is said. Muslim leaders “worry” about
    the widening chasm betweem Islam and the West. Every incident that plays itself out on the world stage, as with this
    latest cartoon debacle, adds another block in the wall separating the Muslim world from the rest. You cannot threaten
    people with death every time you perceive an insult to something you hold dear. The civilized world will not tolerate it.
    As Muslims continue to settle in foreign lands, they are going to have to accept and live with the fact that there are people
    the world over, of all races and religious denominations, that are rude, insulting, intolerant, and predisposed to stereo-
    types, racial, religious or otherwise. Rational discourse and reasonable protests are acceptable means in dealing with
    ignorance. If, indeed, the majority of Muslims worldwide are peace loving and tolerant, as some claim, the problem is
    that the rest of the world doesn’t hear you. We instead hear the bombs, the murders and the constant death threats and
    chants calling for the destruction of anything non-Muslim. We hear the imams, clerics, and political leaders inciting the
    populace into a maniacal rage. Because of all of these examples, violence is indelibly linked to Islam, yet Muslim leaders
    can’t seem to understand why their religion is disrespected around the world. We cant’ hear the moderates among you,
    for your silence is deafening.
    If it’s apologies, respect, and tolerance they want, they had better clean up their own backyard first. Only then will the wall
    between these cultures begin to come down.

  3. Israpundit » Blog Archive » Samarra: Symbol of Islam’s Great Divide Says:

    [...] The war within Islam has been almost completely ignored by our leaders, despite the fact that we see Shiite Muslims killing Sunni Muslims and vice versa almost every day in Iraq. By ignoring this internecine conflict, fallacious arguments about Muslims being “besieged” by the West will persist. This meaningless sophistry distracts civilized societies from doing what must be done: smashing Islamo-fascism in the same way as Japan’s neo-BushidŨ imperialists and Germany’s Nazis were stopped in WWII. Islamo-fascism = communism = fascism = any other name given to utopian, anti-democratic, totalitarian ideologies (”a [black, stinky] rose by any other name”). [...]

Leave a Reply

By posting a comment, you agree to our Terms of Service and Usage.