Muslim Zionism
June 6, 2006, 2:22 pm |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
by Daniel Pipes
New York Sun*
June 6, 2006
http://www.danielpipes.org/article/3654
* Cross-posted with permission
Might Muslim Zionism be stronger than Jewish Zionism?
Although the question may sound preposterous, it is not.
Jewish Zionism evolved out of a steadfast three-millennium-old love of Jerusalem that flourished despite a dispersion that settled Jews far from their holy city. This love of Zion inspired the most extraordinary nationalist movement of the 20th century, one that motivated a far-flung population to relocate to their ancient homeland, revive a dead language, and establish a new polity – and to do so against intense opposition.
Muslim Zionism, by contrast, has a conditional and erratic history, one based on an instrumental view of the city. Each time Jerusalem has emerged as a focal point of Muslim religious and political interest since the seventh century, it has been in response to specific utilitarian needs. When Jerusalem served Muslim theological or political purposes, the city grew in Muslim esteem and emotions. When those needs lapsed, Muslim interest promptly waned. This cyclical pattern has repeated itself six times over 14 centuries.
In the first such instance, an account in the Koran tells how God instructed Muhammad in 622 to pray toward Jerusalem and 17 months later redirected him to pray toward Mecca. The Arabic literary sources agree that the Jerusalem interlude constituted a failed effort to win over Jews to the new Islamic religion.
The same utilitarian pattern holds in modern times. Ottoman neglect of Jerusalem in the 19th century prompted the French novelist Gustav Flaubert to describe it as “Ruins everywhere, and everywhere the odor of graves. … The Holy City of three religions is rotting away from boredom, desertion, and neglect.” Palestinian Arabs rediscovered Jerusalem only after the British conquered it in 1917, when they used it to rouse Muslim sentiments against imperial control. After Jordanian forces seized the city in 1948, however, interest again plummeted.
It revived only in 1967, when the whole city came under Israeli control. Muslim passion for Jerusalem has soared over the past four decades, to the point that Muslim Zionism closely imitates Jewish Zionism. Note two similarities:
-
Emotional significance: Ehud Olmert, today the prime minister of Israel, said in 1997 that Jerusalem represents “the purest expression of all that Jews prayed for, dreamed of, cried for, and died for in the 2,000 years since the destruction of the Second Temple.” The Palestinian Authority’s Yasser Arafat echoed his words in 2000, declaring that Jerusalem “is in the innermost of our feeling, the feeling of our people and the feeling of all Arabs, Muslims, and Christians.”
- Eternal capital: Israel’s President Ezer Weizman reminded Pope John Paul II en route to his visit to Jerusalem in March 2000 that the city remains Israel’s “eternal” capital. A day later, Arafat welcomed the pontiff to “Palestine and its eternal capital, Jerusalem.” Jewish and Muslim religious leaders meeting with the pope likewise spoke of Jerusalem as their eternal capital.
Generalizing, the analyst Khalid Durán observed in 1999 that “there is an attempt to Islamize Zionism … in the sense that the importance of Jerusalem to Jews and their attachment to it is now usurped by Palestinian Muslims.” (Interestingly, this follows a larger pattern of Palestinian Arab nationalism imitating Jewish nationalism.)
This effort is working, to the point that, as secular Israelis increasingly find themselves unmoved by Jerusalem, Muslim Zionism is emotionally and politically more fervid than its Jewish original. Note the example of rival Jerusalem Days.
Israel’s Jerusalem Day commemorates the city’s unification under its control in 1967. But, as Israel Harel writes in Ha’aretz, this tribute has declined from a national holiday to just “the holiday of the religious communities.” By contrast, the Muslim version of Jerusalem Day – instituted 11 years later, by Ayatollah Khomeini in 1979 – attracts crowds of as many as 300,000 people in distant Tehran, serves as a platform for rousing harangues, and is gaining support steadily around the Muslim world.
A 2001 poll found that 60% of Israelis are willing to divide Jerusalem; just last month, the Olmert government announced its plans to divide the city, to little outcry.
Therefore, I conclude that the Muslim use of Zion represents a more powerful force today than the Jewish love of Zion.
This text is excerpted from the Distinguished Rennert Lecture he delivered last week in Jerusalem for Bar-Ilan University.
Related: Israel, Arab/Muslim World, Islam, Palestinians
June 7th, 2006 at 1:16 am
This is not a piece of the usual stellar fare we have come to expect from Dr. Pipes. His play on the word Zionism is in poor taste, but perhaps he employed that connection to make his point in a more startling way.
Dr. Pipes’ article is however, more observation than probing analysis.
The comments by Arafat about the importance of Jerusalem to Palestinians were about as disingenuous as Arafat was. Whether Arafat believed his words of Palestinian love for and sense of importance of Jerusalem was not the point.
The point of Arafat’s words, just like Iran declaring in 1979 an official Iranian Jerusalem day was not because Jerusalem meant so much to the Palestinians and their Arab and Muslim supporters, but because Jerusalem meant so much to the Jews.
For Arafat and other Muslim leaders in the region, such words extolling the importance of Jerusalem to the Palestinians constituted a denigration in Western eyes of the uniqueness of the Jewish dream to return to Jerusalem and have that city the capital of a new Jewish state.
Arafat’s words regarding Jerusalem therefore constituted a cog in the wheel of the Palestinian/Arab/Muslim propaganda machine that by even the 1970’s, was beginning to churn out Palestinian versions of truths regarding Israel that were starting to gain acceptance by Westerners as reflecting part of the truths and realities underlying the issues between Israel and the Arabs.
When not railing for Jewish blood, the Palestinians with their trusted supporters turn their efforts to operating their very effective and efficient propaganda machine, advocating a various assortment of lies such as ancient and recent historical revisionism to enhance their historical connection to the land of Israel and to Jerusalem while calling into question or denying outright the Jewish connection and inventing rights they demand be fulfilled, which rights come out of thin air.
Dr. Pipes’ concludes with:
“the Muslim use of Zion represents a more powerful force today than the Jewish love of Zion.”
There is some truth in that.
The Palestinian leadership has turned Jerusalem into a symbol for Palestinians to inspire emotions of love and need for Jerusalem that never were and a rallying cry to marshal the Palestinian people and their terrorist troops to forge ahead, fueled by their burning desire for Jerusalem and their Jew hatred stoking the fires of their rage to take Jerusalem from the Jews and claim it as their own.
The love of Jerusalem, both tangible and intangible must be restored full strength to all Israelis and indeed all Jews. Jerusalem however must also become a symbol for Jews and Israelis that will ignite and then stoke the unquenchable fires of determination for Jews worldwide to stand with Israel and do all that is necessary to keep the Palestinians from denying the complete fulfillment of the Jewish 2000 year old dream for Jerusalem.