Are MoveOn’s new legislators loyal to the United States or George Soros’ money?
by Bill Levinson

We have covered exhaustively MoveOn.org’s propagation of racist, anti-Semitic, anti-Catholic, and anti-Evangelical hate speech, along with blood libels of the United States itself, on its Action Forum. It now becomes eminently clear that MoveOn.org is “with the terrorists,” as shown by a petition that it circulated back in 2003 along with its connection with terrorist cheerleader Michael Moore.

MoveOn.org is not merely a tentacle of the (George) Soros-Occupied Government (SOG), it is also apparently “Michael Moore’s Army.” Per Michael Moore’s Army On The Move,

(CBS) By David Paul Kuhn,
CBSNews.com Chief Political Writer
Michael Moore has a war plan to defeat President Bush. With MoveOn.org, he now has his army.

It is bad enough that MoveOn.org has knowingly and willfully served as a platform for hate speech of the same kind that real Nazis used to perpetrate the Holocaust, blood libels of the United States itself, and attacks on Christians and African-Americans. Michael Moore is, according to his own Web site, a terrorist sympathizer.

The Iraqis who have risen up against the occupation are not “insurgents” or “terrorists” or “The Enemy.” They are the REVOLUTION, the Minutemen, and their numbers will grow — and they will win. Get it, Mr. Bush?

Michael Moore says, in his own words, that the terrorists who are murdering our men and women in uniform– noting that only a uniformed soldier or partisan can legally kill an opposing soldier on a battlefield– along with innocent Iraqis are “Minutemen.” During the most recent election, Michael Moore encouraged MoveOn.org members to help turn out the vote. In other words, MoveOn.org is knowingly and willfully consorting with an individual who is cheerleading for the murderers of American soldiers and innocent Iraqis.

MoveOn.org’s implicit support for terrorists is hardly surprising, given this petition that it circulated in 2003.

The Petition

We, the undersigned, citizens and residents of the United States of America and of countries around the world, appeal to the President of The United States, George W. Bush; to the NATO Secretary General, Lord Robertson; to the President of the European Commission, Romano Prodi; and to all leaders internationally to use moderation and restraint in responding to the recent terrorist attacks against the United States. We implore the powers that be to use, wherever possible, international judicial institutions and international human rights law to bring to justice those responsible for the attacks, rather than the instruments of war, violence or destruction.

In other words, MoveOn.org wants the United States to use courts and lawyers in an attempt to bring to justice the perpetrators of 9/11, instead of blowing the Taliban and Al Qaida off the map with cluster bombs, fuel-air munitions, and similar weapons.

Furthermore, we assert that the government of a nation must be presumed separate and distinct from any terrorist group that may operate within its borders, and therefore cannot be held unduly accountable for the latter’s crimes. It follows that the government of a particular nation should not be condemned for the recent attack without compelling evidence of its cooperation and complicity with those individuals who actually committed the crimes in question.

This is not true if the government is knowingly and willfully harboring the terrorists. If it is, it becomes a party to the terrorists’ actions and therefore places itself in a state of war with the United States. International law says that a neutral country cannot harbor a belligerant’s military assets without becoming a party to the conflict in question. Neutrals are required to intern (hold for the duration of the conflict) soldiers, warships, aircraft, and so on that stray inside their borders.

If the neutral country is incapable of doing this, then it has been invaded by the military assets in question the way Belgium was invaded by Germany during the World Wars. In this case, the other side has the right to fight the invader inside the helpless neutral country. If the neutral is unwilling to do this, it has sided with the belligerant to which it is giving aid and comfort, and can be held accountable by the other side. This, in fact, describes the situation in Lebanon.

Innocent civilians living within any nation that may be found responsible, in part or in full, for the crimes recently perpetrated against the United States, must not bear any responsibility for the actions of their government, and must therefore be guaranteed safety and immunity from any military or judicial action taken against the state in which they reside.

Lastly and most emphatically, we demand that there be no recourse to nuclear, chemical or biological weapons, or any weapons of indiscriminate destruction, and feel that it is our inalienable human right to live in a world free of such arms.

MoveOn.org wants us to sing Kumbaya with the individuals whose actions included slitting flight attendants’ throats, murdering flight crews, and burning thousands of innocent people alive in the World Trade Center, except for those who jumped to their deaths instead. We do not see why Al Qaida should enjoy the protections of the Hague and Geneva Convention, when it refuses to obey the rules of war. If MoveOn.org feels otherwise, its members should hand themselves over to the enemy to have their heads cut off at the enemy’s convenience.

As it stands, MoveOn.org is knowingly and willfully undermining the security of the United States while sympathizing with its enemies. The loyalty, patriotism, and reliability of the election victors who accepted support from MoveOn.org in the latest election is therefore questionable. The following individuals should be watched very carefully for evidence of disloyalty to the United States or collaboration with its enemies:

1) Patrick Murphy (Congress, PA-08)
(2) Robert Byrd (Senate, WV).
(3) Bob Casey (Senate, PA).
(4) Nick Lampson (Congress, TX-22)
(5) Sherrod Brown (Senate, OH)
(6) Bill Nelson (Senate, FL)

The question of divided loyalties– and we do not understand how someone can be loyal to both the United States and George Soros’ money– is not an idle one. As reported by Investors’ Business Daily,

Congress: The likely new chairman of the House Judiciary Committee says he’s just fighting bigotry in leading a Democrat jihad to deny law enforcement key terror-fighting tools. But he is in the pocket of Islamists.

John Conyers, son of a leftist Detroit union activist, represents the largest Arab population in the country. His district includes Dearborn, Mich., nicknamed “Dearbornistan” by locals fed up with cultural encroachment and terror fears from a steady influx of Mideast immigrants.

Conyers, who runs an Arabic version of his official Web site, does the bidding of these new constituents and the militant Islamist activists who feed off them.

Conyers’ demands for slavery reparations already shows his total lack of personal character, ethics, and integrity, and his obvious sympathy for militant “Muslims” makes it necessary to question his loyalty to the United States and his concern for the safety of its citizens. MoveOn.org is a very dangerous fifth column for extreme left-wing forces and possibly worse, and it must be regarded as such.

---

---

Related: Philosophy / Ideology

---