by Bill Levinson

Multiculturalism, which contends that no culture (shared set of values, attitudes, and beliefs) is better than any other, is a key weapon in militant “Islam’s” assault on Civilization. It ties in closely with political correctness, which seeks to forbid any criticism of so-called minorities’ behavioral choices. If the multiculturalists take the following as a willful and intentional slap in their faces, that is how we intend them to take it.

Click here for cartoon

Any multiculturalists want to call this denunciation of behavioral choices racist? Bring it on. (If you feel that denunciation of these behavioral choices is a criticism of any racial or ethnic group, you are effectively saying that such behavior is a genetic characteristic of said racial or ethnic group, and guess what that makes you.)

Cultures that sanction and promote domestic violence, misogyny, “honor killings” of women for “adultery” (which includes being raped), brutalization and murder of gay people, suicide bombing, terroristic violence, cutting people’s throats while chanting to Allah, oppressing people for being Jews, Christians, Hindus, or the wrong “kinds” of Muslims, and trying to take over the societies they infest like the parasites they are are dirt cultures, gutter cultures, and trash cultures. They, and those who choose to belong to them, are unworthy of the respect that a lady or gentleman of breeding accords a pet or a domestic animal.

Race is one’s skin color, which one cannot change and should not be expected or asked to change. Culture is a choice, just like the clothing one chooses to wear is a choice. It is not racism to say that someone’s clothing is ugly and filthy, and the cultural “clothing” of militant “Islam” is the filthiest on earth. Any multiculturalists or Kumbaya-singers who cannot stand this, well, we can fix your credibility so you can.

Once you get past the lance points, it’s like killing rabbits.
—The Earl of Uxbridge in Sharpe’s Waterloo

During the horse-and-musket era of warfare, a lance was a truly terrifying weapon. Bullets were relatively impersonal, one could not see them coming, and there was not much the individual soldier could do to avoid being hit. Soldiers who would stand in lines while being decimated by cannon balls, grapeshot, and musketry would often flee when attacked by lancers. Each lance had perhaps a thousand or more pounds of man and horse behind it, and it was also easy enough to tell if the lancer wanted you. The mere thought of having that weapon driven into and through one’s body was enough to effectively scare many armies to death. The same concept apparently applies to political correctness; the fear of being called a racist or [Michael Savage nasal whining tone] insensitive [/Michael Savage nasal whining tone] seems to paralyze many of Civilization’s would-be defenders into silence and inactivity.

George S. Patton Jr., however, demonstrated that the lance’s power is almost entirely illusory, at least against a competent opponent. Per his Saber Exercise of 1913,

In attacking a lancer, rapid approach is even more important than against a swordsman. The only moment of danger is when the point of the lance comes within the first reach of the fully extended saber. If, at that moment, the swordsman lunges, forcing the lance to the outside, he is safe and the lancer is at his mercy.

Or, “Once you get past the lance points, it’s like killing rabbits.” And once you get past the enemy’s squeals of “racism” and “insensitivity,” you usually find that he has no defense whatsoever against whatever you are trying to do. This has in fact been our experience. We must adopt the attitude recommended by General von Clausewitz in On War, and recognize no laws of sensitivity, decorum, or political correctness beyond those necessary to avoid exposing ourselves to counterattack. We must, in fact, know no law other than our own power.

Woe to the government which, relying on half-hearted politics and a shackled military policy, meets a foe who, like the untamed elements, knows no law other than his own power!

…Unless an enterprising martial spirit is in command, a man who is as much at home in war as a fish is in water, or unless great responsibilities exert a pressure, inactivity will be the rule and progress the exception.

….The first of these [determinants], which creates a permanent tendency toward delay and thus becomes a retarding influence, is the fear and indecision native to the human mind. It is a sort of moral force of gravity, which, however, works by repulsion rather than attraction: namely, aversion to danger and responsibility.

We have never had any problems from operating in this manner. The Million Mom March (formed 1999, died by our hand 2001) had a seemingly-perfect politically-correct shield: mothers and children. We exposed its misuse of 501(c)(3) tax-exempt money to support Al Gore’s political campaign, and it collapsed visibly in the spring of 2000–perhaps costing Gore the few hundred votes he needed in Florida. Not all the politically-correct wailings of “the mothers are doing it for the chillldddrennnnnn” in the world could save it.

We also, in cooperation with a couple of other individuals, crippled MoveOn.org by forcing it to take down its Action Forum in 2006. Several organizations, including Jewish Voice for Peace’s Muzzlewatch.org, the Anti-Defamation League, National Jewish Democratic Council, and Jewish Funds for Justice ran to MoveOn.org’s rescue with the usual politically-correct squealings of “Republican smear job.” They were met with blunt and decisive frontal counterattacks, with the result that Jewish Funds for Justice apparently withdrew from the controversy, NJDC is getting slapped in its face whenever we feel like slapping it,

and Muzzlewatch.org also realized that it had called out the wrong people. They did not realize that the inclination of an opponent who knows no law other than his own power is not to back off from their numbers, but to welcome them to bring it on. (When the enemies we want to destroy come after us, it saves us the effort of hunting for them, and it also gives us the opportunity to drive them into one another so they trip over each other. The latter can be totally devastating when applied properly.)

The basic rule is to get in the enemy’s face and hit through him. This is true in physical conflicts, and in political ones as well. Anyone who has broken practice boards in karate or a similar martial art understands the concept. If you hit tentatively, with any doubt as to whether your fist will go through one, two, or even more pine boards, your hand will fail to penetrate and you will probably bruise your knuckles. If you are sure you are going to hit through the boards, you feel very little as they split in half. Riding a horse over a barrier is another good exercise. If you have any doubt about whether the horse is going to jump a three-foot obstacle, the horse will sense your doubt and swerve aside. If there is no doubt in your mind, the horse will obey you.

This mentality was drilled into the Russian Army under Suvorov (1729-1800). He made his soldiers practice the “attack through,” in which lines of men would run at each other with fixed bayonets. At the last moment, the men raised their bayonets out of line and stepped to one side to avoid hitting each other, but otherwise it was the real thing. Cavalry drilled against cavalry and infantry in the same manner. Horses and their riders were not to be afraid of cannons, nor were artillerymen to fear oncoming cavalry. Therefore, when Russian soldiers attacked French or Turks with the bayonet, the result was usually a one-sided massacre. In summary, we must think about hitting through the enemy, whether physically or politically.

This means adopting the position that there are not even two sides to the argument. Terrorists, wife-beaters, woman-sellers, rapists (e.g. the ones who say that a woman without a veil is “uncovered meat” whom they are free to “take”), bums in dirty nightshirts who burn books while threatening to kill their authors, and two-legged cockroaches who threaten to reenact 9/11 or say that Islam will rule the United States do not have a side. Neither do those who agitate for displays of the American or British flag because they find these flags offensive. If someone tells us he finds the American flag offensive, our response is that he is free to get his subhuman backside out of my country and move back to whatever Third World garbage hole he came from.

Click here for cartoon

Click here for cartoon

We can back up “Third World garbage hole” (and Michael Savage rightly uses the phrase “Turd World” to describe these so-called countries) with Freedom House’s impartial ratings of freedom around the world. Freedom House rates countries on a 1-7 scale (1 is best, 7 is worst) for political freedom and civil rights. Civilized nations are generally rated “free,” with ratings of 1 or 2 in both categories. Garbage holes like Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Palestinian-controlled Gaza are almost always rated “not free,” with ratings of 6 or 7 in both categories. They also tend to have much lower per-capita incomes, even in oil-rich nations, and frequently shorter life spans. This is not because they are poor, downtrodden, or “oppressed by colonialists.” It is because their dirt cultures, trash cultures, and gutter cultures discourage and even punish freedom of thought and individual initiative. People who read books tend to be a lot more advanced than those who burn them. Here is the truth, and the Third World (especially the militant Islamic world) will just have to live with it until it chooses to adopt superior Euro-American culture.

Israel (2006) [Superior Euro-American culture, people encouraged to read books]
Political Rights: 1
Civil Liberties: 2
Status: Free
Population: 7,100,000
GNI/Capita: $16,240 [despite no oil wealth]

Saudi Arabia (2006) [Inferior militant “Islamic” gutter culture, people flogged for reading the wrong books or speaking the wrong ideas]
Political Rights: 7
Civil Liberties: 6
Status: Not Free
Population: 24,600,000
GNI/Capita: $9,240 [despite enormous oil wealth]

Iran (2006) [Inferior militant “Islamic” gutter culture, uses cranes to hang people as opposed to building things]
Political Rights: 6
Civil Liberties: 6
Status: Not Free
Population: 69,500,000
GNI/Capita: $2,010 [despite enormous oil wealth]

(Multiculturalists and Islamofascists, please feel free to construe the above as yet another slap in your faces.)

We are sorry if the multiculturalists find the above facts offensive or unpleasant, but they will just have to live with them. The following lines describe the attitude we must take toward the multiculturalists and their politically-correct thought police.

Scorn and defiance; slight regard, contempt,
And any thing that may not misbecome
The mighty sender, doth he prize you at.

–King Henry V, Act 2, Scene 4

---

---

Related: War Against Islamo-fascism, Political Correctness

---