The True History of Slavery
March 30, 2007, 12:50 pm |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
History can be always be distorted or manipulated to suit the ends of those who want to put forward their erroneous viewpoints
By Kenneth T. Tellis
This is the story of a conversation with an Haitian taxi driver and his call for reparations from the white, European colonial powers because of their involvement in the slave trade. It needs a rebuttal, which will at the very least brings to the fore all of the issues concerned.
If we go back in biblical times and even before that, slavery has been the normal tactic of conquerors. If we go back to beginning of the Islamic period, we will note that slavery began in earnest after 632 A.D. The Arabian Caliph sent an agent named Mohammed Ali to Africa to capture and bring back slaves to Arabia soon after the 7th century. At that time the Arabs did not consider Africans as humans, but only as chattel.
The beginnings of slavery date back to the period of the Muslim conquest and forced conversion of Buddhist Afghanistan, Assyrian Christian Mesopotamia, Zoroastrian Persia, the Christian Kingdoms in Aram (Lebanon and Syria), Asia Minor, Roman occupied Jewish Palestine, Coptic Christian Egypt, Christian Nubia (Sudan), Algeria, Morocco, Christian Carthage (Tunisia today) and Libya, and reached into the heart of darkest Africa, through the lands of the Tauregs and into Timbuktu, Nigeria, Musabenbeque (Moçambique), Zanzibar (which came under the Al-Busaid dynasty of Oman till January 1964), Somaliland, Cote d’Ivoire and into Uganda. If we go even further, the countless Muslim invasions of Hindustan (India), the first by Mahmud of Ghazni from Afghanistan into the territory of Raja Dahir of the Scind, followed by the Mughal (Mongol) invader Taimur-the-Lame into Hindustan where they forced the conversion to Islam of thousands upon thousands of Hindus there, does not speak well of Islam.
It was in Africa that all the big Arab slave markets began, and they traded with Portugal, Spain, Holland, France and Britain. On the South-East African coast the biggest slave trader was a Principe Henri of Pondoland, an African Christian who traded in slaves with the Portuguese. The U.S. came into the slave trade much later after its independence in 1783. Even in the case of New France, the Governor Louis de Buade, sieur de Frontenac, comte de Palluau et Forest was the first to bring African slaves to far North America in November 1689, which was considered a great triumph of France. In most of Africa Tribal Chiefs did big business by capturing neighbouring tribes and selling them as slaves to Arabs or Europeans. This has been the bugbear of the unknown Africa, and has been denied by many of today’s Africans themselves, but there is historical data that can prove all of this to be true. Arab Dhows can still be found hugging the East African coast in search of slaves in this very day and age.
There never has been any doubt that Spain created the Amerindian slaves in the Americas, and later brought in African slaves to work in the gold mines of the Spanish colonies in America. But Spain and Portugal had thrown off the yoke of centuries of Islamic (Moorish) occupation in 1492, since their invasion by the Berber Chieftain Tariq Ibn Zayyed of Morocco. He landed his army at Calpe (now Gibraltar or Jebel Tariq) in 711 and renamed the country Andalus and forcibly converted Christians to Islam, now started to build his own colonial empire in the Americas. Nor is there any doubt that the British and other colonial powers brought African slaves to the Americas and the Caribbean, having bought them from Muslim (Arab) slave-traders on the West African coast, but the British also brought in indentured slaves from India. These were people who were kidnapped and brought to Demarara (later British Guiana) and Trinidad and Tobago.
Go to Java and other parts of Indonesia and see the many Buddhist Temples, which are now derelict because of the Islamic conquests and forced conversion to Islam. Of course Bali is the only part of Indonesia that retained its Hindu identity from Asokan times. In Afghanistan, an ancient Buddhist land, one can see the giant statues of Lord Gautama (Buddha) carved into the stone cliffs of Bamiyan by ancient artisans, but all this fell to the to the onslaught of the invading Muslim armies, which forcibly converted the country to Islam. The fanatical Taliban (Muslims) of Afghanistan attempted to destroy these archeological sites with dynamite. It should be noted that no history book on Asia and Africa blames the Arabs outright for their enslavement of the African people. The reasons are evident. Many of the African and Asian countries are Muslim, or have alliances with Islamic states and it would not serve their interests to expose this. Thus the blame for slavery is conveniently laid at the feet of the European colonial powers.
It was Islamic conquests after the 7th century that brought about a great influx of slavery. Of course it was Salau-ud-Din (Saladin) the Kurd who captured 20,000 Christian men, women and children pilgrims on their way to the Holy Land and sold them into slavery. Salau-ud-Din also invaded Nubia and forced Christian monks to convert to Islam or die. While most converted, one named Maurice would not, and he was skinned alive on orders of Salau-ud-Din — that is the Black St. Maurice — whose statue graces the Cologne Cathedral. Is this not the great Salau-ud-Din who Muslims think of as an Islamic warrior?
Remember along the coasts of the Maghreb (North Africa) the Corsairs did a thriving slave trade by attacking European and American shipping, capturing the crews, which they then sold as slaves. But it was Stephen Decatur of the U.S. Navy that foiled the Corsair raiders and soundly defeated them. Then there are the Othman Turks whose fleets attacking the Mediterranean coast of Europe and captured and sold thousands of Europeans into slavery. There were big slave markets in Tripoli, Libya, Meknes, Morocco, Tunis, Tunisia (Carthage), Algiers, Algeria, all countries conquered and colonized by Arabs from the Islamic invasion of the 7th century. The capture by Muslim pirates of the niece of the Empress Josephine (Beauharnois) of France, who was returning from a convent in Martinique who later sold her to the Sultan of Othman Turkey. Slavery was part and parcel of Islamic society and we cannot get away from it. A perfect example of this, is the Holy City of Meknes in Morocco, within whose walls were buried alive some 20,000 white Christian slaves.
Neither Islamic society nor those who support them want these truths to be known. There are still slave markets in Arab countries, where one can bid and buy a slave of any nationality. The present forced conversion of Christians to Islam in the Sudan by the Arab regime in Khartoum is an on-going affair. In Marseilles, France alone every year almost 4,000 girls disappear. This is where there are gangs operating the slave markets from Arab and African countries. To talk of European colonialism of the past and forget the slavery of the present is to be duplicitous. We can only deal with the present, because there is not much of the past that we can really remember.
We see no cry for justice and reparations asking Muslim countries to make reparations for their enslavement of Europeans and others, from those that now expect the former European colonial powers to pay for their past sins. Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iraq, Libya, Tunisia, Morocco, Algeria and other Islamic states are just as guilty of the enslavement of millions of people, if not more so as all the European colonial powers put together. Are we to overlook Arab slavery, while we only make it a point to remember the sins of Europe? No country conquered by an Islamic force can ever remember its history beyond the Islamic period. This is the religious brainwashing that has gone on for centuries in the Middle East, Maghreb (North Africa), deepest Africa and the Balkans.
Perhaps it is worth remembering that even the Othman Turks were past masters at religious brainwashing, more so than all the communists in Europe. It is time to take a serious overview of past history to get an honest judgment of its reality vis-à-vis the Moors in Spain, the Arabs in all of the present day Middle East and Africa, and the Othman Turks in the Balkans after the conquest of the Byzantine Empire in May 1453. In Byzantium they took the Christian women as concubines, and killed, converted or castrated the Christian men in that great kingdom. After that the Turks were in occupation of Bulgaria, Rumania, Albania, Serbia, Croatia and Hungary for centuries and forced people to convert to Islam or die. Why do you think there is a Muslim Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina today, but not for the Othman Turkish Islamic conquest centuries ago.
Do not forget the Turks still occupy Constantinople, which was part of the Greek Nation. Let’s not forget the Armenian genocide of 1915 –21 by Othman Turkey in which 1,500,000 people died. Turkey is still in denial of her crime of the Armenian genocide. There is also the Abyssinian genocide carried out by Il Duce Benito Mussolini’s Italian Legions in the mid 1930s, both of which have been conveniently forgotten by historians. We cannot therefore judge the European colonial powers, if we do not include Islamic invasions and slavery. And if we do not, then we cannot arrive at an honest judgment of all the issues involved. We can deliberately pretend forgetfulness or omit the facts that expose the reality of our time by selective amnesia, but sooner or later it will catch up with us. History, cannot be fooled around with, because it might come back to haunt us.
Share with others (social networking, bookmarking, find related):
Sphere It
Technorati: View blog reactions
Furl This
Fav bookmarking service not in the above list? It's definitely in this drop-down:
Categories, Tags: Arab/Muslim World, Islam, Europe
Trackback: http://netwmd.com/blog/2007/03/30/1516/trackback/
Comments feed: RSS 2.0
Subscribe to netWMD:
FeedBurner
June 21st, 2007 at 3:09 pm
First of all, the Prophet Muhammad of Islam said, “no Arab is superior to a non-Arab, no non-Arab is superior to an Arab.” We are all distinguished by our deeds.
My point is, that if a Muslim commits an atrocity, you blame the PERSON, NOT the reliogion. Also, slavery practiced by Mulsims was NOT like the slavery practiced by Europe. The Prophet of Islam said, “He will not enter paradise who behaveth ill to his slaves. The companions said, “O Apostle of God! Have you not told us, that there will be a great many slaves and orphans amongst your disciples?” He said, “Yes; then be kind to them as your own children, and give them to eat of what you eat yourselves. The slaves that say their prayers are your brothers.”
The Prophet said: ‘Your slaves are your brethren; therefore whoever has a brother who depends upon him must feed and clothe him in the way he feeds and clothes himself; and should not impose upon him tasks which exceed his capacity; should you ask them to do such things, then you are obliged to help them.’
June 21st, 2007 at 3:10 pm
First of all, the Prophet Muhammad of Islam said, “no Arab is superior to a non-Arab, no non-Arab is superior to an Arab.” We are all distinguished by our deeds.
My point is, that if a Muslim commits an atrocity, you blame the PERSON, NOT the reliogion. Also, slavery practiced by Mulsims was NOT like the slavery practiced by Europe. The Prophet of Islam said, “He will not enter paradise who behaveth ill to his slaves. The companions said, “O Apostle of God! Have you not told us, that there will be a great many slaves and orphans amongst your disciples?” He said, “Yes; then be kind to them as your own children, and give them to eat of what you eat yourselves. The slaves that say their prayers are your brothers.”
The Prophet said: ‘Your slaves are your brethren; therefore whoever has a brother who depends upon him must feed and clothe him in the way he feeds and clothes himself; and should not impose upon him tasks which exceed his capacity; should you ask them to do such things, then you are obliged to help them.