Muzzlewatch Shuts Down Blog Comments

June 15, 2007, 1:12 am
  


 

 

by Bill Levinson

Muzzlewatch, the blog of Jews for Jihad A Jewish Voice for Peace just shut down all commenting capability. The ostensible reason involves bigoted comments, but perhaps fear of actual discussion of issues like Palestinian terrorism is the real reason.

From day one, it seemed clear that there was a need for a space where people could freely debate challenging political issues related to Israel, Palestine, and US foreign policy. Over time, however, the comment boards seem to have drawn in those who communicate in a more polarized fashion, and have chased away people seeking more thoughtful dialogue. Lately, the site has become a forum for posting anti-Semitic in particular, and also other bigoted and racist comments, as well as ugly personal attacks.

We wonder whether criticism of Palestinian behavioral choices like terrorism, raising children as live ammunition, and killing each other when no Israelis are handy constitutes “bigotry” and “racism” in Muzzlewatch’s book, but this is pretty standard with the Left. “Muzzling” to the Left consists of exposing its allies’ hate speech at MoveOn.org (we were accused of trying to “muzzle” MoveOn’s Action Forum), but silencing the Right, as done at Tufts University, is perfectly acceptable. Meanwhile, our own position is that people who actually use racist epithets destroy their own credibility, so the conduct is self-punishing. We wonder why only Muzzlewatch seems to be having problems of this nature. In any event, if it can’t take the heat, perhaps it should get out of the kitchen.




Related: Palestinians, Peace Process, Media/Blogsphere


2 Responses to “Muzzlewatch Shuts Down Blog Comments”

  1. AZionist Says:

    I wonder why little attention has been given to the following:

    1. Muzzlewatch muzzled its critics.

    2. Blind adherence to ideology, whether of the right or of the left, is dangerous for human well-being.

    3. I particularly question the habit of both right and left of insisting upon complete slavery to ideology, including linking foreign and domestic policies. I see no contradiction in my position (similar, perhaps, to Meretz) of supporting a “left” view in domestical policy and a “right” view in foreign policy - that is, supporting social democracy in domestic programmes whiles vigorously opposing Islamofascism in foreign policy.

    4. The survival of the Jewish people may depend upon the survival of Israel. For this reason, “Jewish Voice for Peace” is really a voice for a second Holocaust, and we should do everything in our power to muzzle them, without hesitation and without shame.

  2. publisher Says:

    Thanks for your well thought-out commentary. I am in general agreement of your first three points, but do not believe we should go down the path of censorship. Rather, let us expose groups like the Jewish Voice for Peace in the open air of free debate.

Leave a Reply

By posting a comment, you agree to our Terms of Service and Usage.